Sunday, August 21, 2005

Harris Corporation v. Ericsson Inc.

Harris patented a system for reducing interference in celluar transmissions using computer software. Ericsson made a new argument construing the construction of a means-plus-function claim limitation using a recent precedent. The C.A.F.C. held that waiver would not apply to arguments only slightly changed on appeal . The dissent held that the Ericsson's argument was a paradigm shift. See also,

Links to this post:

Create a Link


Post a Comment

<< Home