Friday, June 17, 2005

Upsher-Smith Laboratories v. PamLab

Upsher-Smith sued PamLab claiming that PamLab was infringing Upsher-Smith's patents protecting vitamin supplements that are essentially free of anti-oxidants. The CAFC upheld the lower court's ruling that the patent was anticipated when the prior art taught that anti-oxidants were optional.
Listen to the CAFC's published opinion. [MP3]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home