A Patent Law Blog (Blawg) delivering U.S. patent law case summaries and court opinions as digital-audio (MP3).
Friday, June 17, 2005
Upsher-Smith Laboratories v. PamLab
Upsher-Smith sued PamLab claiming that PamLab was infringing Upsher-Smith's patents protecting vitamin supplements that are essentially free of anti-oxidants. The CAFC upheld the lower court's ruling that the patent was anticipated when the prior art taught that anti-oxidants were optional.
Listen to the CAFC's published opinion. [MP3]
Patent Pod provides digital-audio (MP3s) containing the
speakable-text of recent patent law
opinions of the United States Supreme Court and Federal Circuit Courts.
These patent-law MP3s
can be delivered (via
podcasting) directly to your computer,
portable media player (e.g., iPod, MP3 player), personal data assistant (e.g., Palm Pilot, Pocket PC)
or cell phone (e.g., Treo, MP3 cell phone).
If you notice pronunciation errors, including pronunciation of your name, your firm's name, or any other proper name,
please send the correct pronunciation to andrew.lahser@azbar.org
Google Search
Syndication and PodCasting
If you use iTunes, click below, then press "subscribe"
from within iTunes to automatically download Patent Pod's MP3s to your iPod.
Click below to subscribe using the following services:
Click below to add PatentPod.com to your other RSS or Podcasting software.
Links to this post:
Create a Link
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home